As I watched Monica Crowley sharing her op-ed on Obama,
Clinton and the scandal that prevails; I felt the need to work towards a
conversation. There are many points in which I would like to analyze---so bear
with me as I make these suggestions and allusions.
Following in the same vein of opinion as the author; Monica
Crowley, I am responding to “Why Obama is Torpedoing Hillary Clinton”.
I would first like to point out that the headline itself is indicative
of a dark and sinister plan for the POTUS to be personally infringing upon the
free reign of Mrs. Clinton’s campaigning efforts. If this is true then the
by-product of oligarchs and political cohorts defining and “making” the status
of men and women; is also true. Indicating the strong fact that we do not have
a democracy at all.
I listened to Ms. Crowley as she touted such assertions as “he
needs a successor he can control” and saying the “…investigation would not move
forward unless he wanted it(investigation) too…”
Again, I say wrapped up in these words are all powerful actions
and/or exemptions from men---there is a strong lean toward there being little
to no value in the investigation of possible crime and/or misconduct performed
by Mrs. Clinton. Ms. Crowley; when asked “does he(Obama) have the power to slow
down the FBI investigation” Ms. Crowley responded with a resounding “of course
he is the President of the United States”.
When further queried on her thoughts about the Presidents’
hand in high profile political investigations and allegations---she stated “yeah,
listen, technically, no; the FBI is supposed
to be independent. But we know how this man has operated from the beginning.”
She goes on to say that the only way the “daily leaks” are making press is that
POTUS himself is encouraging and proliferating the practice of “torpedoing
Hillary Clinton”.
The importance of this statement to Jane & Joe 6pack is
that Ms. Crowley failed to think before she spoke. The outcome of her commentary
ultimately insinuates the democratic process can and is usurped by men in
positions of power. She fuels the thought that there are those who are above
the law and by dictation of status alone should not be bothered by such mundane
things as the law.
I encourage Ms. Crowley to look past her very close circle of
influence and recognize there are those of us---without pedigree or pretense;
who can interpret information minus the Manhattan minutia that many pundits
have to pace in precision reporting. I offer her my thoughts as a civilian,
voter, parent, progressive and WOMAN. YOU Ms. CrOwLEY are full of it. You have
failed to report a full story; inclusive of a lack of response to the Trump
intro---where he states that what “Petraeus did was a small fraction” in
comparison to what Hillary Clinton has done. You have failed to make any citing
or reference to any similar case-Petraeus or Sterling. You have also made it
clear, that in your thinking; sitting Presidents’ have the strength to “control”
tickets run shadow administrations.
My purpose in sharing my thoughts with you are to:
1.
Give you hard copy evidence that the story of
Clinton, Emails and the criminal element can be interpreted by the least of us
and it would warrant answers; yet to be answered.
2.
Ask of you to make a broad thought application a
possibility in your reporting----if you look at all the facts, parallel references
and take a real general poll---you will find something very different than that
“Manhattan Minutia” "Sex and the City" flurries you and your phonies are so accustomed to dealing with.
(yep ended w/a prep)
3.
FIND YOUR REAL SELF AND DO SOME REAL REPORTING;
what you currently do I find to be garbage—and the world really needs people to
commit to truly working a craft and bringing dignity to professions, citing
journalism as a crux of societal conjecture. Spinning bullshit and lies will
not help this election or the people.
In closing, as I watched your interview; I almost felt sick
as I wondered if the masses would be able to grasp what it really was that you
were saying. I hope this offering incites you to have a bit more truth and a
lot less autonomy.
